Showing posts with label Messier 42. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Messier 42. Show all posts

Monday, 1 February 2021

#130: For All Mankind, and M 42.

This is my article for our club newsletter in Windsor, Ontario, Canada for January.  Past newsletter and information about the club can be found on our website, RASC Windsor.

It was way back in 1968 when I first got interested in astronomy.  I began with binocular observations of the moon in early November.  In December, Apollo 8 and 3 astronauts successfully orbited the moon and returned safely.  The next craft to go that way would be Apollo 11 half a year later, followed by #12-17.  Those of us lucky to be alive during those heady days all have our own special memories, and we continue to treasure them.  Sometime in the late 1980s I got interested in Brian Eno's ambient music, including one of my favourite albums, called Apollo.  The music is all instrumental, quiet and gentle for the most part, and was used as background for a film of the same name.  The original film, which I was never able to track down, had no speaking, just images and music.

That film was re-imagined, reworked, and renamed For All Mankind in the late 1980s.  This time dialogue was added to the images, but only the voices of Apollo astronauts, mission control, and John F. Kennedy were used.  Al Reinert, the director, got cooperation from NASA, and Criterion bought the rights to the film.  I didn't even realize the film was showing on the Criterion Channel until I bought an updated and expanded version (2 CDs) of the album by Eno. The CD notes talked a lot about the movie, and lo and behold, I instantly put it into my queue and it has now been watched, enjoyed, and loved. There have been many documentary specials about Apollo, most of them featuring narration, talking heads, and Walter Cronkite. This one is different.

What Reinert did was assemble NASA footage from the archives (a story in itself, told in one of the extra features), much of it never seen before, and compact the lunar missions into one big mission, showing scenes from all the lunar flights, and even from an earlier Gemini flight.  It becomes one brilliant and focused film, and instead of dwelling entirely on science, it lets the astronauts, in their own words during the missions, describe their feelings and responses to what they were doing, with Houston mission control listening in.  Thus we get a totally different take on Apollo, much more human and aesthetic than the science ones we were given back in the day.  We see candid moments aboard the spacecraft never seen before, and we follow along from the Earth to the Moon on a voyage of discovery that has yet to be surpassed in human history. 

 Along with the feature comes 4 extras, filling in information that the movie could not show.  For example, the movie has no talking heads, but the extra features do contain interviews with many of the astronauts years later.  One short feature talks exclusively with the late Alan Bean, who became an amazing artist upon his return (he died in 2018).  Another short extra feature talks about the lengths to which the director went to assemble the footage he uses in the film. Yet another one interviews 15 of the Apollo astronauts. The whole collection is available for purchase on DVD, and looks like something I will purchase if it leaves Criterion Channel before I can watch it again a few more times.  If you do not subscribe to Criterion Channel this is only one reason out of about 2,000 to do so.  And if the Apollo lunar missions seemed a bit dated and unexciting to you, or you don't really know that much about them, or you would just enjoy a new perspective, then you need to watch this film. It may even be something your club might consider showing at a future meeting.

Messier of the Month: M 42

It’s finally time to tackle Messier 42! Last year I talked about its little brother or sister (I can never tell which), Messier 43. They both appear in the same field of view, but are distinct from one another. M 42 is one of those objects that consistently improves with increased aperture and magnification. But it’s always best to begin with the naked eye view, followed by binoculars. My first view was with 6 x 30 binoculars, beneath a street light in front of my home in Sudbury, back in the winter of 1969. My first telescopic view was a month or so later, with a red and blue toy 3” reflector, a plastic model of the 100” Mt. Wilson scope, with a terrible mirror and a plastic eyepiece giving about 25x. Even that view blew my teenage mind! More recent views with my vastly superior 2” refractor confirm this as a public showpiece in even the smallest instrument.

In March 1974 I observed the nebula from Sudbury with my 4.5” Tasco Lunagrosso reflector. Viewing it at 22x I wrote at the time, “The whole scene had a three-dimensional atmosphere to it, and one could imagine oneself peering into the swirling depths of the universe.” In the 12” from Hallam (January 2019) I wrote “Visually, I find the nebula much more satisfying than any photo of it I have ever seen. I would much rather view it in a telescope than look at a photo.” Parts of the nebula resemble the giant wings of a bird, wings extended. A large dark lane appears in the south. The blown out area around the quadruple star has a distinct 3D appearance, and seems long and cylindrical, like a giant wave about to crash. At 12” there is simply too much detail for the eye to perceive, and as magnification is increased (up to 250x) the nebula becomes mottled, with many variations of grey, white, and black, as well as many shades of brightness. Following along the extensions, it takes a long journey before it fades away into the background sky. The cluster involved with M 42 contains about 20 stars, with Theta 1 and 2 being the main highlights. The Trapezium (quadruple star, also Theta 1 Orionis)) is seen well at 84x and 136x, along with 2 other fainter stars north, embedded in the nebula. This object is required viewing for all amateur astronomers.

Messier 42—-oc 1976: Cluster size 47’, a sparse group.

gn 1977: 20’x10’, emission and reflection nebula, associated with the cluster.

Monday, 12 October 2015

#81 Small Telescope Adventures: Part 4

The Olcott Project:  Adventures with a 2" Telescope--Nights 4 & 5

We have managed to squeeze two more clear nights out of the October new moon session.  I am still hard at work with the 12", and recently completed observations of "Stephan's Quintet" in Pegasus, along with eg 7331 and its attendant galaxies.  We take time out to work with Space Eye from time to time during these clear nights, finding it just as addictive as observing with our bigger scopes.

The night of October 10th began as a hazy mess.  We drove to Hallam Observatory anyway, thinking that we might just set up the 2" and review some of the already seen objects.  Well, the night didn't turn out to be so great for galaxy hunting, so the 12" stayed inside the VW Tiguan.  However, the haze lifted enough to provide us with a pretty decent night of observing.  We set up Deb's 6", along with Space Eye, and we ended up comparing views.  The 6" has about 9x the light gathering power of the 2", so there isn't much to compare.  I ended up using the 2" exclusively that night, adding 7 new objects to our ever-growing list.

Each time we use the scope we get better at finding objects using Olcott's charts.  A big part of this new-found success is the red dot finder now installed, replacing the 5 x 20 toy finder scope.  We are finding the alt-azumith's up and down locking device a bit of a pain, especially when the scope is pointed high.  Once an object is sighted and the device is "locked," there is some play in the system, causing the tube to fall just a bit short of where it was placed.  We are learning to compensate, however.  Also, when the knob is tightened, it really needs to be tightened.  A few times I thought I had tightened it and the eyepiece gracefully descended to a vertical position.  There are no problems with the side to side controls.  Both slow motion controls work flawlessly, too, and the focusser has loosened just enough to make it perfect for getting that exact image of a star.

Object #14:  M13:  20'; Vis. 5.8; Br. * mag. 11.9:  We had a good, long look at the grand-daddy of northern sky globular clusters, and Space Eye did not disappoint!  At 30x the center blazes with light.  Three distinct levels of brightness can be observed, as the cluster fades outwards.  A large area of very faint haze surrounds the central, brighter areas.  At 60x the texture of the cluster becomes granular.  At 75x 3 or 4 stars can be seen, winking in and out.  Fun!  Olcott devotes five paragraphs to this cluster, but only on his binocular and naked eye observing page!
http://www.vcastro.com/messier/page004/html/04-0811_m13_gk0r3006_std.jpg

Object #15:  Delta Herculis:  3.2-8/11":  Not an easy double star for a 2" scope.  But what are all my years of observing experience for, if not for challenges like this one?  We split it at 60x, but the two stars appeared very close.  It's very likely that a trained eye is needed here.  The primary star is white.
http://www.astrosurf.com/bolteau/etoilesdoubles/delta-herculis.jpg

Object #16:  Beta Lyra:  A multiple star with 4 members:
     3-6.7/46"
       -9.2/67"
      -9.8/86"
On the first night I misread Olcott's list and left out the 9.8 mag. member.  However, that was remedied on the 11th of October, when we reviewed the whole system.  Three star members are observable at 30x, and the fourth at 60x.  Beta also is a gateway star to M 57.  Olcott discusses Beta's variable characteristics, as it is one of the most famous variables in the sky.  It was considerably dimmer than Gamma tonight.
http://i0.wp.com/www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/beta_lyrae.gif

Object #17:  M57 "Ring Nebula:"  76"; Vis. 8.8:  Small, faint but quite distinct at 30x, I reached here using the slow motion controls from Beta Lyra.  60x and averted vision really help with the view, though the dark center is elusive and challenging.  75x (Epic 11 8 mm) gives really decent views of a now dark-centered ghostly object.  It appears to be pretty large in this range, and very round.  This marks Space Eye's first planetary nebula!  Olcott says: "The "+" [on his chart of Lyra] marks the location of the famous "Ring Nebula," a wonderful sight in our largest telescopes."
http://www.jagowds.com/_jap/gfx/deepsky/m57_042404.jpg

Object #18:  NGC oc 663:  15'; Mag. 7.1; Br. * mag. 9:  Observed both nights (10th and 11th), I really enjoyed spending time here.  This is another open cluster success for Space Eye.  I enjoyed long looks using 30x, in addition to sweeping the area slowly.  40x and 60x were also used with success.  Along with several obvious brighter stars, many faint ones were also seen.  The cluster field fits nicely at 60x.  The surrounding area is also rich with stars, making for fine sweeping with the slow motion controls.  Recommended for 50mm apertures.
http://www.jagowds.com/_jap/gfx/deepsky/m57_042404.jpg

Object #19:  Struve 163 (Cass):  A triple star. 6.2-8.2/35"  -9.7/115":  On the 10th I overlooked the fainter star, so we redid it on the 11th.  Nothing was split at 30x.  However, at 60x a lovely gold and blue pair resolved, though somewhat faint.  It looks much more impressive in the 6", but it isn't too bad in the 2".  The third member was seen at 60x and 75x under excellent skies on the 11th.  It may have been visible on the 10th under less favourable sky conditions, but I did not look for it.
http://www.deepskywatch.com/images/sketches/struve-163-sketch-s.jpg

Object #20:  NGC oc 7789:  25': Vis. 6.7; Br. * mag. 10:  Olcott places the cluster on his Cassiopeia chart, and says:  "NGC 7789 was discovered by Caroline Herschel in 1783."  That's not much of an incentive to go looking for it, but experienced observers will know that this is one of the most remarkable open clusters in the sky.  In my 12" scope at 136x (82 degree field) I am left speechless and breathless every time I observe it.  It is a challenge, however, for the 2".  I located it both nights, even though I really wasn't expecting to find it.  The given magnitude is deceiving.  Due to its vast size it is very faint.  We found it at 30x, though it was better at 40x, where a few stars began to resolve.  It was too faint for 60x to be of any use.  It looks like a ghostly, round, very faint cloud.  I was thrilled to even find it!  A second look on the much better night of the 11th showed very tiny stars resolving across the entire hazy patch at 40x.  Definitely worth a stop for veteran sky viewers.
http://www.walter-hohmann-sternwarte.de/galerie-dateien/offene_sternhaufen/NGC7789-20120907_kl.jpg

Observing Night #5

The night of October 11th gave us a near-perfect sky.  Much of the time I was hunting galaxies with the 12", but we took time out to add a few new objects to Space Eye's ever-growing list.  We had quick looks at Messier 8, 20 and 21 in Sagittarius, but I did not take any notes.  We'll wait until next summer for these, and many others, in that fabulous constellation.  Here are three new objects added to our list.  Pretty soon we will be halfway through our goal of 60 objects, and we haven't even started on the moon or planets yet!  I'm thinking this project may easily reach 100 objects.

 Object #21:  NGC oc 752:  75'; Mag. 5.7; Br. * mag. 8:  The cluster is easy to find thanks to a wide double star (56 Andromedae: 6-6/189"), a lovely object on its own, but lying just south of this remarkable open cluster.  Both members of the double are white, and it can be seen in binoculars.  The cluster can best be appreciated at 30x, using the slow motion controls to drive around its nearly endless circumference.  This is one of the largest and richest clusters one could imagine, and would be a perfect candidate for our 4" Astroscan.  However, the 2" shows it in its full splendour, too.  This one is worth many more visits!  Olcott merely places the cluster on his Andromeda chart.  However, he does mention the double star:  "The double star 56 can be separated with a field glass if it is held steady..."
 A nice image, showing the adjacent double star 56 Andromedae.
http://www.amateurastronomy.co.uk/constels/and/ngc752.gif

Object #22:  Messier 42 & 43 "The Great Nebula:"  Wow!  Certainly one of the finest objects for a small telescope, it is totally enthralling and amazing in Space Eye!  It appeared far brighter than I expected, and a lot of detail can be observed, even at 30x.  We viewed it around 1 am, and it wasn't even that high yet.  The Trapezium star group was bright and very appealing.  60x shows off the nebula to great advantage, with dark and light areas mingling and curling like smoke.  This is truly remarkable in the 2", and should get some oohs and ahhs at open houses and star parties, especially if someone has never seen it before.  Obviously it is worth many repeat visits.  Olcott devotes several paragraphs to it on his binocular page.  On the telescope page he says:  "Of course observe the nebula.  An excellent way to do this is to sight the telescope in advance of the nebula, and allow this to creep into the field.  A far better idea of the extent of the luminosity can be obtained by using this method.  Only a long exposure photograph can show the true vastness of this wonder of the skies."  Perhaps, but a 50 mm will not disappoint.
https://www.google.ca/search?client=tablet-unknown&hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1360&bih=631&q=delta+herculis&oq=delta+herculis&gs_l=img.12..0i24.1585.4928.0.7128.14.10.0.4.4.0.126.993.2j7.9.0....0...1ac.1.64.img..1.13.1004.nv6SdVRqaDM#hl=en&tbm=isch&q=messier+42&imgrc=_

Object #23:  Messier 1 "Crab Nebula:"  I had zero expectations for this faint object, so you can imagine my surprise and delight when we located it at 30x without much trouble!  Apparently all of the faint galaxy work I do with the 12" has paid off!  The Crab was really faint, but nonetheless quite unmistakable.  It was oval, and though fairly small, we found that using averted vision and cupping our hands around the eyepiece really helped to bring it out from the background.  Huzzah!  Olcott says:  "The + shows the location [on his chart of Taurus] of the famous "Crab Nebula," the first nebula discovered by Messier.  It takes a powerful telescope to bring out any detail."  This one is for experts only.  There is not much here to see for a novice.
http://www.members.shaw.ca/guy.m/Sketches/DSO/M1.jpg

Until next time, clear skies to all!
Mapman Mike