Showing posts with label uranometria. Show all posts
Showing posts with label uranometria. Show all posts

Monday, 15 January 2024

#143: Leo Deep Sky Part 4: Unranometria Chart #92, Left Side

I am observing with a 12" Dob.  There are an awful of NGC galaxies on Chart 92, left side.  Bear with me as I pass on my observations of them.  This page includes M 105 and its pair of attendant galaxies, as well as the justly famous Leo Triplet.  I will begin at the bottom of the page with NGC 3441, which virtually sits on the ecliptic.  From there I will zig-zag north on the right half of the (left) page.  The observations are mostly from 2013-2017.
 
eg 3441:  0'.7 x 0'.4:  Vis. 13.6; SB 12.1:  The galaxy is easy to spot at 136x.  It is very oval, and close to a mag. 14 star.  It is brighter and full-size at 187x.  Views are still good at 250x.
eg 3462:  1'.7 x 1'.2:  Vis. 12.2; SB 12.8: Noted at 60x, the galaxy appears small and faint.  At 100x it is now oval, with a bright centre.  At 136x the galaxy is quite bright, and pretty large using a.v.  A faint star is S.  At 187x and 250x the galaxy is quite small but bright using direct vision.  using a.v., however, enlarges the object considerably, to a mid-size oval with a very bright centre.  the centre itself is pretty large, with a fainter outer envelope.
eg 3462.  
 
eg 3427:  1'.1 x 0'.5:  Vis. 13.2; SB 12.4:  Observed at 136x, 187x, and 250x.  At 136x it is small, faint, and oval.  It is brighter at 187x, but only the central oval is seen well.  250x shows an extended object, pretty bright, using a.v.
eg 3427. 
 
eg 3417:  0'.7 0'.4:  Vis. 14.6; SB 13.1:  At 250x this is a very small oval patch  SP eg 3425 and a small stellar asterism. 
eg 3425:  1' x 1':  Vis. 13.1; SB 13:  Viewed at 136x and 187x, the galaxy has a bright stellar centre.  It appears small, bright, and fuzzy.  At 250x it is round and distinct.  It lies north and between two distinct stars, part of a small asterism.
eg 3439:  0'.6 x 0'.4:  Vis. 14.3; SB 12.6:  Elusive, tiny, and ghostly at 187x and 250x.  The galaxy makes a triangle with two faint stars, with the galaxy P the north/south stars.
eg 3428:  1'.5 x 0'.7:  Vis. and SB 13.1:  (Note--most catalogues equate 3428 and 3429 as the same object. However, Uranometria does show two galaxies.  I have only seen 28).  Observed at 136x and 187x, I noticed a bright central area with fainter envelope elongation.  The two very bright stars nearby (mag. 7.5 and 8) made initial viewing difficult.  At 250x the galaxy is petty large and very elongated.
eg 3428 is at centre.  3429 is the tiny haze preceding it, N of the last bright star.  
I have only observed 28. 
 
UGC 6062:  1'.4 x 0'.7:  Vis. 12.8; SB 12.6:  Viewed at 136x, 187x, and 250x, the galaxy is pretty bright and oval.  I estimated its size (I had no field info at the time, but just took a random chance at finding it) at 1'.2 x o'.9.  A bit off!  A much better object than either eg 3476 and 3477, both just NP.
eg 3476:  0'.8 x 0'.7:  Vis. 13.8; SB 13.2:  A pair with eg 3477, below.  Both galaxies can be seen at 136x, and remain in the field at higher power, too.  A faint star is near them.  76 is pretty faint but not a difficult object to locate.  It can be seen best using a.v.
eg 3477:  0'.9 x 0'.3:  Vis. 14.8; SB 13.2:  A pair with 3476, above.  77 is more oval than 76, and has a brighter centre.  Both can be seen even at 187x and 250x.
eg 3476 is at centre; 3477 is SF. 
 
eg 3490:  0'.5 x 0'.5:  Vis. 13.8; SB 12.4:  These little galaxies are a favourite with me; I love hunting them down.  This one was located at 187x, using hand drawn chart.  It is a tricky object!  Though a bit easier to view at 200x, it still requires a.v. and good experience.  It is NP a very faint star.  It becomes much easier to see at 250x, though it is still not an easy object.  It is small, round, faint, and hazy.
eg 3466:  1' x 0'.6:  Vis. 13.6; SB 12.9:  A pair with 3467, below.  Both galaxies were located at 100x, and seen well at 136x.  66 is elongated, and has a brighter centre.  67 is round, also with a bright middle.  A nice pair at 187x.
eg 3467:  0'.8 x 0'.8:  Vis. 13.4; SB 12.9:  See 3466, above.  Fun to see with a 12" and good transparency.
eg 3466 is at centre.  3467 is towards the left (F) edge. 
 
eg 3433:  3'.5 x 3'.3:  Vis. 11.6; SB 14:  Located a bit P a mag. 9.5 star. the galaxy was noted at 100x.  Better at 136x, it was also seen at 187x.  It is very large, oval, and has a very slightly brighter centre.  I tried to relocate it later, after chasing my wind-blown dew cap, but was unsuccessful.
eg 3433. 
 
eg 3444:  1' x 0'.2:  Vis. 14.7; SB 12.8:  Glimpsed at 187x, I saw a very small, faint slash, perhaps 0'. 5 x 0'.1?  Except for a brisk wind, the sky was exceptionally transparent.  Good luck to you if you try this!
eg 3444. 
 
eg 3438:  0.8 x 0.8:  Vis. 13.4; SB 12.8:  Located at 100x, using a detailed hand drawn map, the galaxy is quite small and hazy.  AT 136x it is small, but the centre is bright.  A mag 14 star is just SF.  At 187x the envelope around the bright middle is much fainter. 
eg 3438. 
 
I. 664:  1'.3 x 0'.9:  Vis. 13.1; SB 13.1:  A pair with eg 3492, below.  Both galaxies are located within Abell Galaxy Cluster 1142.  Both objects can be seen at 100x and 136x.  92 is a bit brighter and easier to see.  664 seems smaller, but is not difficult to view.  At 187x the oval shape in both becomes more apparent.  They both now show stellar cores, surrounded by bright centres with fainter, extended envelopes.  An easy pair to see, near a fairly bright star.
eg 3492:  1'.1 x 0'.8:  Vis. 13.2; SB 12.9:  A pair with I. 664.  See above.
eg 3492 at centre.  I. 664 is NP. 
 
eg 3506:  1'.2 x 1'.1:  Vis. 12.5; SB 12.6:  Located at 60x.  It is bright and round at 100x and 136x.  At 187x it becomes even brighter, and now clearly shows a stellar core.  At 250x it is pretty big, but becoming dimmer.  The fainter envelope surrounding the bright centre shows well here.
eg 3506.  
 
eg 3491:  0'.9 x 0'.9:  Vis. 13.2; SB 12.9:  Located at 100x, it seems very bright at 136x and 187x.  It is round and quite easy to view.  The galaxy precedes two very bright stars.  A very faint star (mag. 15?) is following.  The galaxy is pretty small, and does show a stellar core. 
eg 3379, Messier 105:  5'.4 x 4'.8:  Vis. 9.3; SB 12.8:  Part of another very fine Leo Triplet!  All three galaxies can be seen at 60x, and even at 200x they still fit in the field of view.  Thus they are much closer together than the actual triplet, making these perhaps more fun to view.  M 105 is round, big, and easily the brightest of the 3 Messier galaxies (M 96, M 96).  The other two are close enough to easily sweep to at low power, making this one of the most exciting areas in Leo.  At 200x and 250x M 105 is still very, very bright, showing a large core area, a large somewhat less bright area surrounding it, and plenty of fainter envelope around all.  In order of brightness among the three close Messier objects, it is M 105, M 96, and M 95.
eg 3384:  5'.5 x 2'.5:  Vis. 9.9; SB 12.6:  3384 is nearly as bright as M 105, and it is curious that it was never assigned a Messier number.  The core is much smaller than M 105, and its envelope fainter.  At 200x and 250x the core is very bright, and the surrounding envelope is wide, fat, and oval.  A highlight of Leo observing.
eg 3389:  2' x 1'.3:  Vis. 11.9; SB 13.2:  Though much fainter than its two companions, this is also a beauty in a 12" scope.  Even at low powers it is very elongated, and well positioned preceding 3 bright stars in a rough line.  The galaxy is long and lovely at 136x, best with a.v.  200x shows it very long, wide in the centre, and though it is pretty bright, its glow is ghostly.  To me it gave the impression of a nearly cloaked space ship!  I will undoubtedly return to this area again and again, as I do with the original Triplet.  Leo turns out to be an amazing journey with a large Dob!
M 105 centre; eg 3384 at upper left, and eg 3389 at centre left.  
M 95 and M 96 are also an easy star hop away, towards the right side. 
 
eg 3412:  3'.6 x 2':  Vis. 10.5; SB 12.6:  This big, bright galaxy is close enough to the M 105 group to consider making it a sixth member on wide sweeping nights.  Large and bright at 84x, 136x only improves things, also showing a 14.2 mag. star on the galaxy's N edge.  Another fainter star is SP.  This big galaxy is nearly as bright at eg 3384.  It is smaller, but has a very bright core.  At 187x and 200x the envelope is faint, but large and oval.  It can now be seen to extend right to the 14 mag. star N.
eg 3412. 
 
eg 3419:  1'.2 x 1'.1:  Vis/SB 12.5:  A pair with eg 3419a, below.  The main galaxy is bright and oval at 100x.  136x shows a bright core with a fainter surrounding envelope.  Up to 250x shows it well, with an elongated core caused by a foreground star in there being involved.
eg 3419a:  1'.8 x 0'.3:  Vis. 14.1; SB 13.3:  This galaxy sits just N of 3419, and is pretty tricky to view.  187x, 200x, and 250x shows a stellar core, faint, and an occasional faint slash with a.v.  Good luck with this one!
eg 3419 in centre, with 3419a to the north. 
 
eg 3391:  1' x 0'.5:  Vis. 13; SB 12.1:  Located at 100x, at 136x it was a nice oval haze, with the middle showing as slightly brighter.  Seen well between two faint stars, I was able to view it up to 200x.
eg 3489:  3'.5 x 2':  Vis. 10.3; SB 12.3:  Easy to see at 60x, this is one very bright object!  Views are great up to 272x.  The galaxy is large and has a very bright central globe surrounded by a large oval haze, much less bright.  It is quite a stunning sight in a 12" mirror!  A faint star (14?) is P.
eg 3489. 
    
eg 3485:  2'.3 x 2':  Vis. 11.8; SB 13.3:  Located at 100cx, the galaxy is pretty faint and pretty large.  Views are better at 136x, now showing a bright middle.  Views are best at 187x with a.v., where 3485 is now pretty bright.  At 250x it begins to fade.  Afterwards I could see it at 60x.
eg 3485.  
 
eg 3399:  0'.8 x 0'.8:  Vis. 12.9; SB 13.3:  A pair with 3405, are both small and pretty faint.  05, the fainter one, is actually an interacting pair of round galaxies, though the eyepiece impression is of an oval single galaxy.  99 was spotted at 136x, very near a bright star, helping to hide it,  it lies within a group of four stars.  At 187x both galaxies are seen, with 05 following very closely.  It is very small, very faint, and a bit oval,  They both have stellar cores.  Views are good at 200x.
eg 3405:  0'.8 x 0'.7:  Vis. 13.4; SB 12.7:  A pair with 3399.  See above.
eg 3399 is centre, with 3405 to the left.  05 is actually a close pair of galaxies. 
 
eg 3347:  3'. 7 x 2'.1:  Vis. 12.5; SB 14.6:  A pair with 3447A, both galaxies are faint and oval at 187x, 200x, and 250x, using a.v.  Both lie close to a mag. 9.9 star, making these objects a challenge.  three very faint stars form an arrowhead pointing to the galaxies.  The pair lie between this pattern and the 9.9 mag. star, though very close to the star.  Both galaxies lies on the border of galaxy cluster Abell 1126.  47 is oval.
eg 3447A:  1'.5 x 0'.8:  Vis./SB 12.5 (?-- more like 14):  A pair with 3447.  See above.
eg 3447, centre.  3447A just NF. 
 
eg 3454:  2'.1 x 0'.4:  Vis. 13.5; SB 13.1:  A pair with 3455.  55 was seen at 100x.  It was quite large, oval, and S of a mag. 11 star.  54 was seen at 136x, N of the mag. 11 star.  It was a narrow slash.  At 187x 54 was pretty nice, but it fades at 200s and 250x.  55 is much bigger and brighter, and is still good to view at 250x.  A fine pair!
eg 3455:  2'.6 x 2':  Vis. 12; SB 13.7:  A pair with 3454.  See above.
eg 3455 is at centre.  3454 is N. 
 
eg 3443:  2'.8 x 1'.4:  Vis. 13.1; SB 14.4:  This one took three attempts to locate, but I got it quickly the third night with a hand drawn detail map.  It was seen at 136x, though it is very elusive.  It was best at 187x, where it was oval with a stellar core and very faint envelope.  It sits between two stars, the P one brighter.  Uranometria notes say "Small, weak nucleus in faint, uniform envelope."  
eg 3443.  A very tricky object to find! 
 
eg 3457:  0'.9 x 0'.9:  Vis. 12.7; SB 12.3:  Located at 100x and 136x, it appears stellar with some envelope around it.  I was round and bright.  At 187x it is still bright, and the round envelope is bigger.  It is not unlike viewing a planetary nebula.  At 200x it remains bright, especially the central core.
eg 3473:  1'.2 x 1':  Vis. 13.5; SB 13.6:  A pair with 3474.  Both galaxies can be seen at 187x.  74 is much easier to see, being small and round.  it is faint, though, and best seen with a.v.  3473 is round, larger, and comes up to a 12.8 mag. star just N.  Lying between two faint stars, it ismuch harder to see. 
eg 3474:  0'.8 x 0'.7:  Vis. 13.9; SB 13.2:  A pair with 3473.  See above.
eg 3473 is at centre.  3474 is SF.  
 
eg 3487:  0'.9 x 0'.4:  Vis.13.9; SB 12.6:  Located at 136x and also observed at 187x, though it was seen only using a.v.  The galaxy is very elongated, very faint, and ghostly.  It appears to sit in a barren section of the sky.
eg 3501:  3'.9 x 0'.5:  Vis. 12.9; SB 13.4:  The central area of this needle galaxy was seen (barely) at 60x and 100x.  Even at 136x and 187x, this is a very faint edge-on, seen best with a.v.  It is very long and thin.  A bright star NP is in the field of view, mag. 9.
eg 3501 is a good catch for a 12" Dob.  In upper left is eg 3507, 
which will be discussed on Chart 73. 
 
This completes the objects seen between 10h48m and 11h04 , or the four first squares on the left hand page.  Now we will visit the remaining 6 squares on Chart 92 left.

eg 3559:  1'.3 x 0'.9:  Vis./SB 12.8:  Observed at 100x, 136x, and 187x,the galaxy is pretty large, but very faint and diffuse, quite evenly lit.  It does not seem to be 12.8 mag., but considerably fainter (13.8?).
eg 3524:  1'.6 x 0'.5:  Vis. 12.8; SB 12.4:  Located at 100x.  At 136x it is bright, very elongated, and pretty large.  250x gives a pretty decent view.  It is still bright.
eg 3524.  

eg 3547:  2' x 0'.9:  Vis. 12.8; SB 13.2:  Located t 100x.  At 136x it was large, oval, and bright.  At 187x it remains bright and pretty large.  250x also gave a good view.  There is now a very faint star F.  
eg 3547. 
 
eg 3526:  1'.9 x 0'.4:  Vis. 13.2; SB 12.7:  Located at 136x, this is as classic edge-on galaxy, among my favourite things to discover.  A mag. 13 star precedes its nose.  It is very elongated at 187x, with star immediately P.  The galaxy is long, thin,and not that bright.  At 250x it is now a ghostly sight.  However, it is large, especially the central oval area.
eg 3526.  
 
NOTE:  eg 3567 and eg 3601 will be discussed on Chart 112. 
 
eg 3624:  0'.9 x 0'.6:  Vis. 13.9; SB 13:  This one was a big challenge on a previous hazy night, but under much better skies the next time it was quickly located.  It was seen at 187x, and though pretty faint, its elongation was evident. 
eg 3666:  4' x 1':  Vis 12; SB 13.5:  Located at 84x.  The galaxy is very bright and very elongated.  At 136x it is harder to see because because of the glare of a nearby 5.5 mag. star.  At 187x and 250x, with the offending star removed from the field of view, I enjoyed good views of a very large, very elongated galaxy.  It shows a stellar core.  There is a large, oval and quite bright envelope.  Occasional glimpses were had of very faint tips, or extensions.  A very faint star lies N.
eg 3666. 
 
eg 3623--Messier 65: 9'.8 x 2'.9:  Vis. 9.2; SB 12.7:  One of many showpiece galaxies in Leo, it is also one of the Leo Triplets.  It is very large and very elongated, and rewards long views by getting larger as the eye adapts.  I saw a dark lane on the F edge, passing the bright core.  This is one of those objects that seems fine at all magnifications, and with almost any size telescope.  It is also one I return to year after year.
eg 3623, M 65. 
 
eg 3627--Messier 66:  9'.1 x 4'.1:  Vis. 8.9; SB 12.7:  Somewhat brighter than M 65, the galaxy also has a squatter shape.  Like its neighbour it is seen well at virtually all magnifications, but I prefer it at 200x.  As it moves across the field of view so quickly, however, it is best sketched at 120x.  The core is star-like, and decidedly N or the centre.  The central bright dome is wider than M 65.  It surrounds the core for some distance.  Next comes the fainter extensions, best seen using a.v.  M 65 and M 66have been my two most frequently viewed objects in Leo so far.  I will continue to view them each Spring.
eg 3627, Messier 66. 
 
eg 3628:  13'.1 x 3'.1:  Vis. 9.6; SB 13.5:  The third member of the famous Leo Triplet, along with M 65 and M 66.  It is faint but enormous at 60x, it is possibly the largest galaxy I have seen outside of M 31.  It is amazing to see in a dark sky at around 100x, 120x, and 150x.  A.v. shows an evenly dim nebula that seems to go on and on.  Dimmer than the 2 nearby Messier objects, it rewards the viewer nearly as much.  The dark lane is not difficult to see.  The galaxy dims considerably at 200x.  All three objects fit into my field of view at 43x and 60x.
 eg 3628, the 3rd member of the Leo Triplet. 
 
eg 3593:  5'.2 x 1'.9:  Vis. 11; SB 13.4:  Located P the Triplet, this has also become a favourite fof mine when visiting the area.  It can be seen well from 60x-200x.  Large, oval, and quite bright, it marks the 4th corner of a rectangle with three bright stars.  The galaxy has a large and bright central area.  It is also a fine object in an 8" scope.
eg 3593 precedes the Triplet, and is worth seeking. 
 
eg 3596:  4' x 3'.8:  Vis. 10.9; SB 13.7:  Yet another fine galaxy close to the Triplet, this one is NP.  Though easily seen on a good night, it is much fainter than 3593, above.  It appears as a dim and very large circle, or possibly very slight oval.  I can see no hint of arms or even a brighter centre.  Easy to access from the Triplet and 3593.  I now call this area the Quintet!
eg 3596.  
 
eg 3592:  1'.8 x 0'.6:  Vis. 13.9; SB 13.8:  A threshold slash, not small, was seen at 120x and 150x.  A.v. was the only way to see this object.  Seen from my suburban back deck in 2013! 
eg 3598:  1'.8 x 1'.3:  Vis. 12.3; SB 13.3:  This small oval galaxy was not difficult to locate from my deck, but at first I thought I was looking at two faint stars.  A faint star sits on the galaxy's N edge.  The object was seen at 100x, 120x, 150x, and 200x, even without using a.v.  I was surprised by the small size of the galaxy, given its dimensions.
eg 3598.  
 
eg 3602:  1' x 0'.3:  Vis. 15; SB 13.5:  I looked long and hard many times for this galaxy in the past.  Tonight it was finally glimpsed, elusive and faint as it is.  No elongation was apparent, just the central core glimpsed at 125x and 150x.  This is the dimmest of 7 closely groped galaxies in this area.  Good luck with this one!
eg 3602.
 
eg 3659:  2'.3 x 1'.3:  Vis. 12.2 x 12.9:  Located easily at 100x.  At 136x it is very elongated, with a wide middle.  It seems to glow softly and evenly.  Views are good at 187x with a.v.  It is pretty large, but not terribly bright.
eg 3655:  1'.5 x 1':  Vis. 11.7; SB 11.9:  Even at 60x and 100x the galaxy is very, very bright and pretty large!  At 136x a faint star is NF.  The galaxy is very elongated.  At 187x it shows a very large central area.  The surrounding envelope is still bright at 250x.
eg 3681:  2' x 2':  Vis. 11.2; SB 12.5:  One of 4 galaxies 4 degrees N of the Triplet, and about 8' F.  Located at 83x, it lies NF 81 Leonis, a star of mag. 5.5.  The galaxy is bright, round, and pretty large.  At 136x it seems to be the brightest of the big three in this immediate area.  It shows a bright middle, pretty large, with a fainter envelope.  At 187x it is large, round, and bright, and its full size can be experienced with a.v. 
eg 3681 in centre.  At upper left is 3684. 
 
eg 3684:   3'.1 x 2'.1:  Vis. 11.4; SB 13.3:  In a diagonal line with 3681 and 3686, all 3 are fun to sweep between at low and high powers!  They all all quite close together.  this one is an easy object to view well at 136x, located S of a pretty bright star.  At 187x it is a very good object, especially with a.v.  It is 2nd brightest of the three.  It is very oval, and shows more brightness in the larger central area.  It certainly is a large object!
eg 3684 in centre.  3681 in bottom right corner. 
 
eg 3686:  3'.2 x 2'.5:  Vis. 11.2; SB 13.4:  This is the largest of the three galaxies discussed in this last section.  Located at 83x, it is pretty amazing at 136x.  It is also a bit fainter than the other two nearby galaxies, but it is my favourite.  Very good views were had at 187x, especially with a.v.  It is oval, very large, and shows a stellar core.  While all three galaxies are recommended for a 12" scope, this one is the showpiece of the crowd.
eg 3686. 
 
Leo Uranometria notes will be continued next time.
 
Mapman Mike


 



 

 


 
 
 


 



 



 

 

 


 

 

 
 

 
 

 
 


 



 




 



 
 

 

 


 



 

Monday, 24 April 2023

#139: April Observing Highlights

First the bad weather news.  My last observing outing was Sat. April 15th.  New moon was Wed. the 19th.  It has been cloudy since the night of the 15th, and will continue to be cloudy until the end of time, apparently.  Now the good news.  The early part of the lunar cycle provided me with 5 clear nights.  While one of those was windy and frustrating, the others were near perfect nights!  So I managed 15 hours and 45 minutes of telescope time in April.  So far, 2023 is behaving not too badly.  Last month I tried observing much lower in the sky than usual, and had some decent success in the southern regions of Canis Major and Puppis.  Which led me to prepare a list of deep sky objects and double stars in Pyxis, taking in the region of -37 Degrees up to around -18 degrees.  My latitude is 42 N, so my scope is nearly horizontal for some of these objects.  Previously my lower limit for finding NGC objects was -25 degrees, but I see that on some very good nights I can push that much lower.  Faint galaxies become too difficult, but the brighter ones are no problem.  Same with clusters and double stars.

Uranometria Chart 171
And so I spent the early part of four nights in April searching out objects in Pyxis (a compass), with some good success.  My first NGC object was tiny oc 2635, at -35 degrees.  Not an eye catcher at all, just finding it and trying to see it was the challenge here.  I managed to see about 8 of its faint stars, confirming my sighting the next night.

oc 2635 in Pyxis.  At my latitude this likely takes a 12" to find. 

Next night I added two more NGC clusters in Pyxis to my life list.  Oc 2658 sits at a slightly more comfortable -33 Degrees, my best view here was at 221x.  At 10' it is considerably larger than 2635, it also has slightly brighter stars.  I was able to resolve at least a dozen of them.  Oc 2627 was actually a decent prize, making me glad I included Pyxis in my travels through the sky.  It sits near -30 degrees.  It was located at 86x, and at 120x about 15 stars are resolved.  They appear to be between mag. 11 and 12, with unresolved haze in behind.  166x begins to resolve some of that haze, and my best view was at 221x.  Even there, though, there is still some unresolved haze.  Faint stars are popping out everywhere, somewhat like a resolving globular.  A pretty fine cluster!

oc 2658 in Pyxis.
 
oc 2627 in Pyxis appears quite fine in the 12".
 
 
Uranometria Chart 153
I was observing a lot of double stars in between deep sky objects, but next up was eg 2613.  Located at -25 degrees, the galaxy appeared in my 86x field of view.  120x shows the oval centre of a very elongated galaxy (6'.5 x 1'.4) at its widest and brightest.  166x and 221x give glimpses of its longer extensions.  3 very faint stars are on the south side, and a brighter one is just preceding.  Though the galaxy is not a showstopper, it does reward the careful observer with its impressive size and moderate brightness.

2613 is a nice find down in Pyxis.  Note the 3 stars south of it, the first in line almost touching the galaxy.  Also the bright star at its preceding end. 
 
The final two deep sky objects in Pyxis for this year were oc Ru 62, and oc Ru 157.  Both are located between -19 and -20 degrees, and were in decent skies for me.  They were close enough together that I could shuttle between them at low power for comparison.  for 62, a tiny pair of stars north points directly to the cluster.  A mag. 8.5 star sits on its preceding edge.  About 15 stars can be counted here, some of them very faint.  157 is nestled amidst a group of brighter stars.  At its south end is a nearly complete circle of stars.  The cluster is pretty small (7'), and the stars are much fainter than the surrounding field.  It has a few more stars resolved than 62.
 
Finally is cluster E432-3.  Located at 86x.  120x shows two short intersecting lines of stars.  Higher power shows a dozen stars, the brightest one about 10.5 mag.   Nothing to write home about, but it is what it is, and likely seldom viewed.
 
Uranometria Chart 113
Turning now to Sextans (a sextant), I have been working here for several years now.  In addition to trying to locate all of the NGC and IC objects, I have also amassed a large list of double stars to check out, as well as deep sky objects from other catalogues.  These are mostly fainter galaxies from the UGC and MCG catalogues.  My success with these latter objects is scattered, so I do focus more on the NGC.
 
The first decent find of the first night was eg 2156, a bright galaxy that appears very elongated at 120x (1'9 x 0'.9).  I was able to see it with my 8" stop placed over the secondary mirror supports.  It is pretty large and bright using 12".  A 9.4 mag. star is located 2' south following, but the galaxy is still easy to see.  At 221x the centre is very bright and oval, showing a fainter outer envelope.  My best view was at 333x, showing a long extended nebula with a classic central dome of brightness.

3156 in Sextans.  After observing several very faint galaxies, it's always rewarding to come across a bright one! 
 
Next came a a pair of galaxies, one of them a showpiece!  3165 and 3166 lie very close together in a field of view.  66 is very large and bright, seen well at 8", being oval.  Full aperture at 166x shows its blazing core.  The surrounding envelope is easier to view at 221x, being somewhat washed away by the central brightness.  3165 was located at 166x, being quite large itself, and also oval, but it begins to fade rapidly at 221x.  Now, for added enjoyment and wonder, comes eg 3169, which can be viewed in the same field with 3166!  Both can be seen at 86x using 8" of aperture.  69 has a mag. 10.8 star near the following edge.  At full aperture and 120x the galaxy is bright and oval.  166x gives it a slightly less bright appearance than 66.  Even so, it's still tricky trying to see the extended envelope.  Views remain good all the way up to 333x.  A fun area to explore!

From r to l:  eg 3165, 3166, and 3169.  All are in Sextans. 
 
Eg I. 600 was located at 120x, being quite large, slightly oval, and showing a bright center.  Though ghostly in appearance, I enjoyed a decent view at 166x.  At least compared to some of the fainter discoveries of the night.
 
MCG +0-27-2 represents a type of galaxy I enjoy hunting down.  Very, very small, round, and at first appearing stellar.  This is one time when surface brightness overrules visual magnitude.  Here are the stats:  0'.4 x 0'.4: Vis. 13.8; SB 11.9.  This tiny galaxy was an easy catch at 120x, though it did appear stellar.  116x and averted vision shows a pretty decent envelope, but very small.  Best views were at 221x and 333x, where the galaxy is now bright, but still small.  It shows a stellar core.  At the very end I also observed it at 86x, as a faint and tiny star.

Eg 3243 was located at 120x, but the galaxy is somewhat dimmed by a nearby 10.5 mag. star.  Viewed at 166x and 231x, it is quite large and round, showing a stellar core.  Beyond the core lies a bright envelope of haze, then a fainter layer beyond that.  At 333x the full size can be appreciated.
 
NGC 3243 is in Sextans. 
 
Another small but bright galaxy in Sextans is I. 651.  Located easily at 120x, it appears pretty bright, and quite large (0'.8 x 0'.8).  166x, 231, and 333x all give decent views, with the round nebula exuding a pleasingly ghostly luminescence.

Coma Berenices: Uranometria Chart 91
 
My major spring constellation has been Coma Berenices for several years now, as I slowly and painstakingly make my way through hundreds of NGC and IC objects, mostly galaxies.  This area, lying just above Virgo and immediately following Leo, is filled with some major treasures.  And there are dozens of mid-bright galaxies which I won't even mention here, unless they are in the same field of view as a biggie.

One of my first conquests this year was Messier 98, or NGC 4192.  Seen quite well in earlier days with the Edmund 8", the galaxy is a major sight to behold in a 12"!  Though perhaps not as bright as one could wish, it certainly held my interest for a long time anyway.  It's already a showpiece at 86x (even at 8").  120x shows a tiny, bright stellar core, with elongated extensions heading out from there and going quite far.   This is not an edge-on galaxy, but is tilted slightly towards us.  There is a breathtaking Hubble image of this on the internet.  All magnifications give fabulous views up to 333, with the size expanding with each increase.  Not to be missed, even with a 6" scope!  M98 points directly south towards tiny eg 4186, which is pretty faint and tiny by comparison.  It shows up at the very bottom of the following image.

M 98 in Coma.  These images are all relative in size.  By comparing the images you are also comparing their size to one another.  This is a biggie! 
 
eg 4212 is another galaxy previously seen with the 8".  Located at 86x, it is large, bright, and oval.  At 120x it shows even more of its mass, also becoming quite bright and eye-catching.  166x shows its full size, with a bright centre.  Worth a look.
 
4212 is an impressive sight in a 12" Dob. 
 
Eg 4237 is also worth a stopover.  It's a easy star hop from M 98, thanks to some nearby bright stars.  This is a pretty fine galaxy, even at 86x.  At 166x it becomes on obvious face on (nearly so) spiral, showing a bright stellar core.  There is a bright envelope, but it fades unevenly.  Best view was at 221x.  A recommended stop if in the area.
 
4237 isn't far from M 98 in Coma. 
 
There are two interesting things about eg 4222.  First, this faint edge-on galaxy straddles two constellations.  It's upper half is in Coma, and its lower half is in Virgo.  It's pretty faint, but at higher power glimpses can be had of its full extent.  Best view is 221x with averted vision, as it fades out at 333x.  Secondly, just south preceding it is a real showstopper in Virgo, eg 4216.  This is a breathtaking sight on a good night with a 12" scope.  I had an opportunity to view it over several nights, though I did not officially log it.

4222 in the north straddles Coma and Virgo.  But have a peek south at wonderful 4216 in Virgo!! 
 
A little north preceding 4222 is eg 4189, another large and bright object easily seen at 86x.  At 120x the shape becomes slightly oval, and it is a bit brighter.  166x shows its full size with averted vision.  Lighter and darker areas can be noted within the envelope.  It begins to dim at 221x.
 
4189 in Coma.  Watch for lighter and darker areas in a 12". 
 
I'll finish up with two final bright galaxies, seen together at most magnifications.  eg 4340 and eg 4350 make an outstanding pair of galaxies, with some contrasting detail to make things even more fun.  Both are large and bright, and unmistakable in an 8" mirror. At 120x and 12" both show very bright cores and large envelopes.  50 seems to be a bit brighter overall.  50 becomes very elongated, and starts to resemble a mini M 31, especially at 166x.  In this range 40 appears slightly oval.  The envelope on that one is tricky due to the brightness of the centre.  
 
4350 is in the centre, preceded by 4340, both in Coma.

Also worth checking out in this vicinity are  4239, 4383, and 4405.

Mapman Mike

 



 



 



 
 
 

 
 

 


 


 

Tuesday, 22 July 2014

#50 Summer Observing Plans, 2014

With spring galaxy season officially ended (for me it finally ended last night, when I logged a tiny, faint one in Bootes), it is time to bring on the summer milky way and all of the awesome areas of sky contained within. Last summer I enjoyed quite a lot of clear skies, and was able to begin and finish detailed deep sky observations of Lyra and Cygnus, as well as nearly finish Cassiopeia.  The summer constellations are "up there" a lot longer than those of any other season, thanks to the increasing level of darkness creeping back into our lives.  Combined with generally nicer weather, many of us spend entire nights observing in July, August, and September.  I have already observed most of the summer sky with my previous 8" scope, and I am now having another go with my 12".

My summer plans include observing all of the NGC and IC objects in Aquila, Delphinus, and Sagitta, and also getting a start in Sagittarius.  Hundreds of deep sky objects await, many of them completely new to me.  I have also included all of the open clusters from other catalogs shown on Uranometria 2000, as well as the occasional globular cluster and planetary nebula.  My main goal, however, is the NGC list.  Double stars are not forgotten, as I will go back and review some of the best ones seen previously, along with several I could not split with the 8", or could not find back in the day.  Refer to my earliest blogs for exactly how I go about setting up my observing lists. It's an old-fashioned way, but keeps me entertained for hours on cloudy nights and weekends.

I've already had a good start in Aquila, logging four open clusters last night, including 6709.  There are also three (less impressive) clusters in the immediate vicinity.  However, by star hopping to them from 6709 I got to see a lot of lovely star fields, and got to know another small part of the sky very well.  On previous nights I viewed oc 6755 and 6756, along with other open clusters, a few globulars and planetaries, a variable star and a double.  Since I spent April, May and June hunting down (mostly) faint galaxies, it is pure joy to behold the wonders of the Milky Way once again.  I especially like viewing open clusters, and the 12" has revealed them to me in ways only that level of aperture could.  6709, for example, is a minor treasure in my scope, and I spent a very long time last night enjoying the sight.  I began at 43x, and slowly worked my way up to 200x, stopping off for lengthy views at 60x, 83x, 100x, 125x, 150x, and 187x.  Each view gave a new perspective, and it was like arriving amidst the cluster in a spaceship, having begun some distance away. Once deep inside the cluster, I pulled away again and enjoyed low power views.  Believe me, this is a fun way to spend a night!  Afterwards, once the notes are in the logbook, I go back and compare what I saw now with what I saw years ago with the 8".

My wife and observing partner, Deb, has her own method of tracking down deep sky objects.  Deb now has about a year of solo observing under her belt, after assisting me with sketches at the eyepiece for decades.  She started with our Astroscan 4 1/4" RFT, locating all of the Messier objects to boost her driving and hunting skills. Once she had completed that project, she upgraded to an Orion Starblast 6".  That is one fine little telescope, with some of the sharpest views of stars and deep sky objects I have ever seen.  It more than holds its own against all the super expensive 5" refractors that come out to the observatory to observe. It's only drawback is that it does not accept 2" eyepieces. 

Right now Deb is completing her NGC globular cluster project.  Previous to this she took on Spring galaxies. Her next project, just currently getting underway, is finding open clusters within a specific size and magnitude. Basically she observes a large selection of objects in one category (galaxy, open, or globular cluster) and does a comparative study.  She observes each object with the same three eyepieces, comparing size, brightness and ease of finding and seeing the object.  So she is now an expert observer of galaxies and globular clusters using a 6" reflector.

Because we travel to the observatory in one vehicle, and because my 12" scope takes up a lot of the cargo room, Deb is limited to a 6" aperture, though she is often more than happy to take a peek through the 12". Sometimes we have fun by observing the same object at the same time in both scopes, comparing the views.
As always, I am interested in hearing about other observing methods.  Just remember to have a peek at what else may lie around that deep sky object you are looking at, especially if it lies in the Milky Way.  Star chains, small but colourful double stars, tiny asterisms... it's fun to be surprised by uncateloged, undiscovered wonders, too. Happy summer observing!

Mapman Mike

Wednesday, 24 April 2013

#15: Full Moon: Dark Skies Just Ahead

     The time just before and after full moon is perfect for tweaking one's observing plans.  Spring constellations are available to us for such a short period of time compared to summer, autumn and winter ones that careful preparation is even more important than usual.  I have been trying to make a decent start on Leo, and beginning two nights after full moon I hope to resume my work.  Immediate observing projects are to observe and sketch M 66 and eg 3628.  As the moonrise is gradually set back far enough in the evening, I will leave my back deck and set up my scope farther afield in dark sky locations.  I don't know yet whether I'll be able to observe in the 'preceding' area of Leo, where I have a whole collection of faint objects remaining to see, or if I will have to immediately move my observing session more towards the middle and 'following' sections of Leo.  Leo begins at about 9h 22m r.a., and continues until 11h 58m r.a.  No doubt I will still get lots done in Leo if it's clear, but not necessarily from the first pages of my object list, which generally follows r.a. of the constellation I am observing.

     One thing is for certain; Leo will set relatively early during the night.  Though I have notes prepared for Lyra, I decided I needed something to bridge the gap between Leo and Lyra.  Bootes seems to fit the bill nicely, though I have already observed it in some detail with the 8" scope.  Bootes begins at 13h 16m r.a., continuing to 15h 12m r.a.  Bootes is a galaxy-filled constellation of difficult NGC objects, and it contains not a single Messier object or galaxy of real brightness.  Besides galaxies, there is a lone, very faint globular cluster.  Having already viewed and sketched the brightest galaxies and the cluster, there may be little remaining for me to see except the dozens of much fainter galaxies.  While I don't mind reviewing previous brighter galaxies in the newer 12", I also want to add new NGC objects to my life list.  The good news is that right about now where I live, the trees usually begin to leaf.  When this happens, a lot of ground light pollution is blocked and the sky grows a bit darker.  Any slight advantage might make the difference between seeing a faint galaxy or not seeing it.  This year in southern Canada, however, we seem considerably behind in seasonal changes, and I may have to wait one more full moon before the trees are of much help.

     Leo also offers two close-up charts in Uranometria.  Charts A10 and A11 are galaxy-filled playgrounds, and I hope to make a good start on Abell 1367 (Chart A11).  I haven't yet decided on an observing strategy for this remarkable area.  I will first determine which objects and how many are actually available to me by having a quick look there.  If many or most of them are visible, then I will likely enjoy a galaxy-filled observing orgy over several nights.  As I enjoy star hopping so much, I'm certain to love galaxy hopping, too!  If my skies do a poor job of allowing me decent access, then I will likely plan a road trip with my telescope for next spring to somewhere very dark in order to experience this feast properly.  In fact, an upcoming post will likely be about dark site road trips.  Where to go, when to go, why to go and which way to go.  So stay tuned.

     Full moon is also a perfect time to tune up the scope and accessories.  Cleaning eyepieces and the finder-scope is a great idea, and perhaps doing some collimating on the secondary and primary mirrors isn't such a bad idea, either.  And of course it is a perfect time to scour the web and catch up on some blog reading!  Until next time enjoy the full moon, and join me in anticipating the dark-sky nights that will come soon afterwards.
Mapman Mike

Friday, 12 April 2013

#13: More About Galaxies

     I said awhile back that 5 of every 6 non-stellar objects plotted in Uranometria 2000 are galaxies.  That only includes objects to 15th mag.  If we dip down to 17th or 18th mag, virtually every object past 15 is a galaxy.  They are difficult to avoid if observing faint objects.  Since this blog is currently concerned with the NGC catalogue (and much of the IC list), I will only discuss the main list at this time.  With over 7800 objects of all types in the NGC list, galaxies still reign numerically supreme.  It might be of interest to look at which constellations have the most NGC objects within their boundaries, and just what type those objects are.  Because I live and mostly observe at latitude 42 degrees north, I will only discuss those constellations which are visible from mid-northern latitudes.

     The constellation (north or south) with the most NGC objects is........Virgo!  Not a huge surprise to seasoned observers, I'm sure.  Virgo has 637 NGC objects.  And guess what?  636 of them are galaxies!  There is one lone globular cluster (gc 5634).

     Number two on the list with the most NGC objects is....Ursa Major.  There are 407 NGC objects.  Only two are non-galaxies!  There is a single very famous planetary nebula and one open cluster.

     Number three constellation is Cetus.  Some of it is a bit low in the sky for me, but it is all there.  Cetus has 383 objects.  There is one lonely and very low surface brightness planetary nebula (NGC 246).  The rest are galaxies.

     Number four on the list and close behind is Leo, with 378 NGC objects.   Every single one is a galaxy!  No relief here, though it is peppered with some lovely double stars and multiples.  I am currently beginning my extensive and hopefully exhaustive exploration of this early spring constellation.  It will take me many years.  To date, I have located 13 of its NGC galaxies, though I've officially logged only 9 so far (it`s been pretty cloudy).

     Number five is Eridanus, a constellation that winds from north to south, meaning that I cannot see all of it from my latitude.  With 315 NGC objects, it has one reflection nebula and one planetary nebula.  All the rest are galaxies.

     So, then, the top five constellations for northern latitude viewers contain a total of 2,120 NGC objects.  That`s about 2/7ths of the entire list.  And a whopping 6 of those objects are non-galaxies!  Let`s continue through the top ten NGC constellations.

Number six is Pegasus.  With 298 NGC objects, only 3 are non-galaxies.
Number seven is Coma Berenices.  293 objects.  It has 3 globulars.
Number eight is Draco.  287 objects.  2 planetary nebula.
Number nine is Pisces.  270 objects.  All galaxies.
Number ten is Bootes.  267 objects.  1 globular.

     We are now up to 3,535 objects, nearly half of the NGC list!  All are galaxies except for 15 objects!  I don't know about you folks, but I find this quite astonishing and somewhat amusing.  "Well," you say, "what about those rich milky way summer constellations?"  OK.  Let's look at Scorpius.  Lots of interesting objects there.  Scorpius has a grand total of 71 NGC objects.  There are some totally amazing ones, too.  However, there just isn't a whole lot of them compared to those galaxy constellations (Sagittarius has 77 NGC objects).

     After the top ten NGC constellations comes Hydra, Canes Venatici, Hercules, Andromeda, Aquarius, Cancer and Lynx.  All are very heavy with galaxies.  I am not trying to prove any point here, but merely stating some interesting (for me) facts.  And no, I did not count the objects myself from the atlas.  This website does it for me.  
http://www.nightskyatlas.com/constellations.jsp
I did, however, scan through each constellation's list to search for non-galaxies, so there is some original research involved.
_________________________________________________________________________________

Here are a couple of older sketches each depicting a galaxy I saw with my previous scope, the amazing Edmund 8":
My first attempt to scan some early sketches.
eg 4565, Coma Berenices.  112x.
15'.8 x 2'.1  Vis. Mag. 9.5.  Sur. Br. 13.2.
One of the showpieces of the heavens.

eg 4448, Coma Berenices.  72x.
3'.9 x 1'.4  Vis. Mag. 11.2.  Sur. Br. 12.9
The star field is at least as interesting
as the galaxy.  The scale for this sketch
is obviously not the same as for the one
above--I cropped this one a lot.

Happy galaxy hunting!
 
Mapman Mike